Call for Papers: Conflict and Living Heritage in the Middle East: Researching the Politics of Cultural Heritage and Identities in Times of War and Displacement

[Shalabi House in Erbil. Image via IFPO] [Shalabi House in Erbil. Image via IFPO]

Call for Papers: Conflict and Living Heritage in the Middle East: Researching the Politics of Cultural Heritage and Identities in Times of War and Displacement

By : Jadaliyya Reports

Call for Papers for the Conference Conflict and living heritage in the Middle East: Researching the Politics of Cultural Heritage and Identities in Times of War and Displacement

10-11 May 2016, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq

Summary

Cultural heritage and identities, on the one hand, and armed conflicts and forced displacement, on the other, are central to events unfolding in several countries of the Middle East. Scholars are invited to consider how these issues inter-relate during an academic conference to be held on 10 and 11 May 2016 in Sulaimani (Kurdistan Autonomous Region of Iraq). The event is organised jointly by the French Institute in the Near East (Ifpo) – a public institution of scholarly research in the field of humanities and social sciences with a presence in several countries of the Middle East –, and the Social Sciences Department of the American University of Iraq – a not-for-profit liberal arts institution of higher education located in Sulaimani. As a follow-up to the conference, Ifpo together with local academic partners will organise two research workshops in autumn 2016 in Iraq. Woking languages for these events are French, English, Arabic and Kurdish. The conference and workshops aim to start a conversation between local and international scholars in view of refining theoretical, conceptual and methodological tools and approaches for analysing conflict and living heritage in the region, and to foster collaboration between scholars and academic institutions. The project is supported by the French Embassy in Baghdad and the Institut français in Paris.

Overview

Cultural heritage is central to the wars currently being waged in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen. The international media and organisations, together with governments and heritage professionals – including academics – have focused their attention mostly on damages to archaeological property or sites and artefacts with a highly emblematic global value, at times framed as `universal.` The local meaning of such heritage is generally disregarded, and so are other aspects of affected populations` living heritage understood here as that which gives them a sense of collective identities. Yet local knowledge and know-hows, popular arts, crafts and traditions, religious beliefs and rituals, language and oral expressions, together with religious and vernacular architecture are all forms of heritage that suffer in the on-going wars. In many instances, this living heritage is deliberately targeted by parties striving to perform cultural cleansing. What then happens to living heritage and collective identities in areas affected by war and under new political authorities? What about the heritage and identities of the millions who have been displaced as a result of the recent conflicts in the region? More generally, what can an examination and conceptualisation of the practices and discourses of local actors reveal about the nexus between cultural heritage, identities, armed conflicts and population displacement in the Middle East yesterday and today? The proposed topic calls for considering on-going and recent situations together with more ancient ones such as – but not limited to – the Armenian, Kurdish, Palestinian, or Lebanese cases. It also begs for a comparative perspective between these case and others beyond the region.

The French Institute in the Near East (Ifpo) and the American University of Iraq propose to address these questions during a multidisciplinary academic conference to be held on 10 and 11 May 2016 in Sulaimani, Kurdistan Autonomous Region of Iraq.

The following themes will form the core of the discussions:

 

Theme 1: Heritage and Conflict

In conflict situations, cultural heritage tends to become a contested area where relations of domination and violence are expressed, and where competing groups strive to assert legitimacy. This is manifested, inter alia, through unequal control over space (within urban areas, or on emblematic sites and monuments), and the often brutal removal of cultural attributes or markers attached to collective identities (regional, ethnic, religious, gendered, etc.). One central issue is how civilian populations, on the one hand, and political and military actors, on the other, engage with various forms of living heritage during and immediately after conflict. Discourses, representations, and practices have to be considered to understand the role of heritage as a vehicle for violence between groups, or conversely as a medium to de-escalate conflict and reach comprise.

 

Theme 2: Heritage and Displacement

More often than not, people displaced by conflict experience (usually in gendered ways) violence, a break up of social ties, and a radical separation from their places of origin. Such situations can also brutally severe people`s bonds with their tangible and intangible heritage, particularly when such heritage is targeted by warring parties. The interrelation between heritage and displacement opens up questions as regards the loss of identity reference points, the transformation and redefinition of heritage in exile, and the role heritage plays in the (re)construction of collective memory and cultural identity among refugees. Such issues have to be examined in different contexts and time-frames: in transient or liminal places (such as refugee camps, border or transit areas), or states (such as that of refugeeness), and when exile endures near or far from the homeland. An important question to be addressed is how experiences of exile become incorporated into new heritage discourses that serve as bases for collective memories and identities.

Conference Follow-up

A selection of papers presented at the conference will be submitted for publication to peer-reviewed social science journals.

The conference will be followed by two research workshops organised in autumn 2016 in Iraq as partnerships between Ifpo and local academic institutions. The three-day closed workshops will each bring together about fifteen participants, a least twelve of them Iraqi. Participants will present and discuss their on-going or planned research or writing projects (these can include research papers, articles, or conference presentations). Group discussions will aim at refining theoretical and methodological approaches (including methods of data gathering), identifying possible synergies between scholars and institutions, and developing research and teaching partnerships around relevant themes. Each workshop will end with a public event open in priority to other scholars, the media and civil society organisations.

Submission Guidelines

Submissions for papers to be presented at the conference have to be sent exclusively to the following address: patrimoinesvivants@gmail.com.

Deadline for receiving submissions is 31 March 2016.

Submissions can be received in French, English, Arabic or Kurdish.

They must be submitted as one single PDF file (other formats will not be considered). 

They must include:

An abstract of the proposed paper not exceeding 500 words (one page, single spaced) and comprising of: a title, a clear research question, the disciplinary approach used, the main elements of the proposed demonstration, details of the documentary corpus and/or methodology used, and indications of the main theoretical and empirical references.

The prospective presenter’s short bio (maximum 500 words over one single page) including: his/her main research projects and publications relevant to the conference, details of institutional affiliation, and contacts (email, phone, Skype name, postal address).  

The organising committee will select about thirty submissions on the basis of their academic qualities. Special attention will be given to submissions focusing on Iraqi case-studies past and present.

Organising Committee

Dr Elizabeth Campbell, Assistant Professor, American Univerity of Iraq, Sulaimani (AUIS).
Dr Géraldine Chatelard, Associate Researcher, Ifpo, Amman.
Dr Boris James, Research Fellow and Site Manager, Ifpo, Erbil.
Dr Hassan Nadhem, Co-Chairholder of the UNESCO Chair for the Development of Interreligious Dialogue Studies in the Islamic World, University of Kufa, Najaf.

Practical Information

The organising committee will get back to prospective presenters with an answer no later than 10 April 2016.

The organisers will cover selected presenters’ transportation to Sulaimani together with meals, accommodation and local transportation in Sulaimani for the duration of the conference. No other expense will be covered, and no per diem or other financial compensation will be provided in cash or otherwise.

Attachements in various languages

Call for Papers for the Conference (Kurdish) : Conflict and living heritage in the Middle East [PDF] 295.62 Ko
Call for Papers for the Conference (French) : Conflict and living heritage in the Middle East [PDF] 250.81 Ko
Call for Papers for the Conference (Arabic) : Conflict and living heritage in the Middle East [PDF] 290.71 Ko
Call for Papers for the Conference (English) : Conflict and living heritage in the Middle East [PDF] 252.79 Ko

 

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      Long Form Podcast Episode 8: Resigning the State Department Over Gaza With Hala Rharrit

      In this episode of Long Form, Hala Rharrit discusses the factors that led her to resign from the US State Department, the mechanisms by which institutional corruption and ideological commitments of officials and representatives ensure US support for Israel, and how US decision-makers consistently violate international law and US laws/legislation. Rharrit also addresses the Trump administration’s claim that South Africa is perpetrating genocide against the country’s Afrikaaner population, and how this intersects with the US-Israeli campaign of retribution against South Africa for hauling Israel before the ICJ on charges of genocide.

    • Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      Emergency Teach-In — Israel’s Profound Existential Crisis: No Morals or Laws Left to Violate!

      The entire globe stands behind Israel as it faces its most intractable existential crisis since it started its slow-motion Genocide in 1948. People of conscience the world over are in tears as Israel has completely run out of morals and laws to violate during its current faster-paced Genocide in Gaza. Israelis, state and society, feel helpless, like sitting ducks, as they search and scramble for an inkling of hope that they might find one more human value to desecrate, but, alas, their efforts remain futile. They have covered their grounds impeccably and now have to face the music. This is an emergency call for immediate global solidarity with Israel’s quest far a lot more annihilation. Please lend a helping limb.

    • Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      Long Form Podcast Episode 7: Think Tanks and Manufactuing Consent with Mandy Turner (4 June)

      In this episode, Mandy Turner discusses the vital role think tanks play in the policy process, and in manufacturing consent for government policy. Turner recently published a landmark study of leading Western think tanks and their positions on Israel and Palestine, tracing pronounced pro-Israel bias, where the the key role is primarily the work of senior staff within these institutions, the so-called “gatekeepers.”

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412